WEDDING PHOTOGRAPHY TRUST • LONDON
Is £80 Too Cheap for a Wedding Photographer? Truth vs myths — and what actually determines quality
Is £80/hr too cheap? Not automatically. The real question is whether the photographer is experienced, organised, and clear about what you get. This guide helps you judge properly — without panic, pressure, or guesswork.
Fast answer
- £80 isn’t “too cheap” when pricing is hourly, transparent, and clearly defined
- Quality comes from experience, workflow, backups, and delivery — not just price
- Many couples overpay because full-day packages include unused time
Want clean totals? See Prices & Packages.
Quick proof (before opinions)
Before you judge price, judge results. Here’s where to start: London wedding gallery.
Why couples think £80 sounds “too cheap”
Wedding photography has a reputation for high prices. So when you see “£80/hr”, it can feel risky — especially if you’re used to £1,500+ packages.
However, there’s a key difference: full-day packages and hourly pricing are not the same thing. Hourly coverage means you pay for the timeline you actually need.
If you’re searching for an affordable wedding photographer in London , you’re usually looking for flexibility and clarity — not lower standards.
Cheap vs affordable: not the same
“Cheap” often means
- Unclear deliverables
- Inconsistent edits
- No backup plan
- Late or unreliable delivery
“Affordable” should mean
- Transparent hourly pricing
- Clear inclusions
- Reliable workflow + backups
- Predictable delivery windows
That’s why hourly pricing is popular for registry weddings and smaller celebrations. You avoid paying for empty time, but you still get professional results.
What really determines quality (not the price)
Price doesn’t guarantee quality. Instead, use this checklist — it’s simple, practical, and honest.
- Real wedding experience: handling timelines, light, and pressure
- Calm direction: helping you look natural without wasting time
- Backup equipment: cameras, lenses, storage, batteries
- Consistent editing style: not random filters
- Clear delivery: previews + final delivery expectations
Start with proof: London wedding gallery and client reviews .
Why hourly pricing makes £80/hr possible
Full-day packages push every wedding into the same shape. Hourly pricing adapts to your real plan. That’s why you can keep quality high without inflating hours.
In London, many weddings are compact. Often you need ceremony coverage, portraits, and key reception moments. So paying for twelve hours doesn’t always add value.
If you’re unsure, read: How many hours do you really need for a London wedding? (it helps you avoid overpaying).
When £80/hr is the right choice (and when it isn’t)
£80/hr is ideal for weddings with efficient timelines and focused coverage.
- Registry weddings
- Intimate ceremonies
- Shorter London timelines
- Couples who want calm, natural coverage
However, larger cultural weddings may need more hours or photo + video. In that case, bundles can be better value. Compare totals on Prices & Packages .
So… is £80 too cheap?
No — not when pricing is transparent, the workflow is solid, and the results are proven. Choose based on trust, clarity, and real work — not rumours.
FAQs
Is £80 too cheap for a wedding photographer?
What is the risk of very cheap wedding photography?
Where can I see totals and what’s included?
Leave a reply